I couldn’t get the
computer science generator to generate more than one paper, but I was able to
identify some conventions that I think would carry over into other generated
papers. Most clearly, there is a pattern of a very structured, outline style of
writing. The reader’s eyes are first drawn into the large, bolded title. The
goal of making this font larger and darker than the rest of the paper’s font is
to grab the reader’s attention and to inform them, in a handful of words, of
what the paper is about. Beneath the title, smaller in size but also bolded, is
the list of authors. Computer science papers seem to have more than one author,
as usually more than one person works on the research that is explored in the
paper. The next thing that the reader notices is the bolded headings of the
different sections of the paper. The paper is structured in a clear, outlined
format that is easy to follow. Each heading is clear and short, usually one
word, so that the reader knows exactly what to expect from each section of the
paper. The first section is the abstract, which is a fairly short description
of what the paper discusses. Six headings follow the abstract, some of which
have subheadings that go into further detail about that particular subject. The
general tone of the paper is formal and academic. It is obvious that the
audience is intended to be other academics in the field, as can be seen by the
use of technical and complex terms that the average person would not understand
such as “exploring lambda calculus” and “we can easily visualize pseudorandom
epistemologies”. Though they are filled with complex terminology, the sentence
structure is generally simple, without unnecessary flourishes or complexities.
The next generator I looked at was
the comic strip generator. The conventions for this genre were a little harder
to pin down, though there were a few common things that stood out. First, there
were always the same two characters telling some kind of short story over the
course of three panels. The characters were depicted fairly consistently with
most panels showing them in a full body with speech bubbles coming from one of
the characters. Occasionally, another object was put into the panels to add a
visual effect to the words spoken by the characters. For example, in one panel
the character says, “Your cat is dead”. That character is also seen holding a
dead cat in that panel. The characters were also set against a very plain
backdrop, which forces the reader to focus solely on the characters and what
they are doing instead of anything in the background. Another convention that
was common in the comic strips was cursing. Some people find cursing to be
funny, which is the goal of comic strips. The comic strip panels also made a
few references to current trends like dubstep, iPads, and Instagram to bring a
genre that used to be primarily found in newspapers to seem more modern on the
Internet.
Looking at these websites can really
help someone understand genre if they pay attention to what makes each site
unique. By discovering what the common themes are of the comic strip generator,
it is easy to make the connections to what the conventions of these comic
strips are. Comic strips are visual, and the goal is to make the reader laugh.
That becomes obvious by looking at even just one or two examples of the comic
strip by seeing the visual aspect of the comics, and realizing that the textual
content is not addressing any serious topics. As stated in the prompt, these
are “plug and chug” websites and if someone takes the time to understand the
general format of the “equation” that these websites use; it is much easier to begin
to understand the concept of genre.
Hey Kaitlyn! I thought you did a really good job with your PB1B. I think it was a wise decision to explain two of the generators more in depth instead of briefly explaining all four, given the constraints of the word count. I thought your analysis of the two generators was very complete and thorough and I applaud you for listing so many conventions of each genre. I also thought that explaining “why” each convention is specific to their respective genres showed that you have a good understanding of the relationship between genres and their conventions. In addition to this, I thought the essay flowed really nicely and you did a good job of integrating examples from the websites to aid and support your explanations.
ReplyDeleteYour PB1B very much stood out from the rest. I really liked your analysis of the two genre generators, as they were thoroughly detailed. You were very smart in only picking two generators especially due to the word limit. I especially liked the way you pointed out the bolded headings in SCIgen to attract the computer-science audience. You were very clear and straight to the point, which shows your understanding of the information you wrote. I think you did very well.
ReplyDeleteHi Kaitlyn! I really enjoyed reading your piece of writing because it was very different and unique. You have a very different point of view and you really got into the specifics of each genre so it was very refreshing. I like how you dug into each genre and picked it apart piece by piece, it allowed me to understand each genre a lot better. In general, I would just say to separate everything into smaller paragraphs to make it easier to read as well as more aesthetically pleasing. Overall good job!
ReplyDeleteDr. Pike,
ReplyDeleteMovie reviews are a great textual genre to analyze. You mentioned some of the common surface-level features of syllabi: interpretation, a basic plot summary, and even references to actors’/directors’ prior work, which you mentioned here—“This can be seen when the critic references lead actor Ryan Reynolds’ past movie flops, “The Green Lantern” and “R.I.P.D.”, as examples of how Reynolds has finally found his niche with his role as Deadpool.” As you said, this is all here (the “why”) so that the reviewer can build credibility for him/herself—ie, they’re someone worth listening to—and they can catch the audience/reader up to speed on the “what’s what” of the movie, and whether or not they should spend $ to check it out. I think you know this, but remember: just because they’ve got the same general “genre name” doesn’t mean that all movie reviews are the same. Some of the Rotten Tomatoes user posts, for instance, are super-brief and read a lot more like Tweets.
On to PB1B, I like how you’re thinking beyond the obvious; this line shows me that you’re taking the big picture into consideration and stepping into the artist’s/writer’s shoes: “The characters were also set against a very plain backdrop, which forces the reader to focus solely on the characters and what they are doing instead of anything in the background.” Nice!
I was disappointed that I didn’t get to read your analysis of memes or a genre generator of your own choosing, but I still think you did solid work here. In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. You’re well on our way. By gaining a deeper and more critical reading awareness, you’ll be able to adopt/adapt writer’s choices (their writing) into your own writing—we’re not quite there yet (that’s WP2!), but we’ve got a good start.
Z